| If this is not your name, click here. | | |
| | Contact Us | Order Now | Journals | Bookstore | Register a colleague | | |
| | | ![]() Preliminary Data Show Lucentis Improved Vision Compared to Visudyne in Patients with Wet Age-Related Macular Degeneration Second Phase 3 Study to Show Lucentis Maintained or Improved Vision in Approximately 95% of Patients at One Year - NEW YORK, NY -- January 16, 2006 -- Genentech, Inc. announced positive 1-year results from its second pivotal phase 3 study of the investigational drug Lucentis(TM) (ranibizumab) in patients with wet age-related macular degeneration (AMD). Data from the ANCHOR study comparing Lucentis to verteporfin (Visudyne(R)) photodynamic therapy (PDT) showed a difference in mean change in visual acuity of 18 letters for patients treated with 0.3 mg of Lucentis and 21 letters for patients treated with 0.5 mg of Lucentis from study entry compared to those treated with PDT at 12 months. In the first year of this 2-year study, patients treated with Lucentis gained an average of 8.5 letters in the 0.3 mg dose group and 11 letters in the 0.5 mg dose group compared to patients treated with PDT, who lost an average of 9.5 letters. In November 2005, Genentech announced that the phase 3 ANCHOR study met its primary efficacy endpoint of maintaining vision (defined as a loss of less than 15 letters in visual acuity) in patients with wet AMD. One-year data from the ANCHOR study were presented today during Macula 2006, a medical symposium held in New York and sponsored by the Manhattan Eye, Ear & Throat Hospital. "Lucentis is the first investigational therapy that has shown improved vision, not just a slowing of vision loss, in patients with all types of wet AMD," said Peter K. Kaiser, MD, director, Clinical Research Center, The Cleveland Clinic Cole Eye Institute, who presented the data today. "As a result, physicians may be one step closer to being able to set a new expectation for the future treatment of this condition." An analysis of the 1-year data showed that adverse events were similar to those seen in earlier trials of Lucentis. Common ocular adverse side effects that occurred more frequently in the Lucentis arms than in the control group were mild to moderate and included conjuctival hemorrhage, increased intraocular pressure, eye pain and vitreous floaters. Serious ocular adverse events that occurred more frequently in the Lucentis-treated arms were uncommon and included endophthalmitis and intraocular inflammation (each reported in less than 1% of patients per group). Among non-ocular serious adverse events, the frequency of cerebral vascular events was less than 1% of patients per group. The frequency of myocardial infarctions was slightly higher in patients treated with 0.5 mg of Lucentis (2.1%) than in the other two arms (0.7%). Additional key clinically meaningful study findings include: -- 94% of patients (132/140) treated with 0.3 mg of Lucentis and 96% (134/139) of those treated with 0.5 mg of Lucentis lost fewer than 15 letters compared to baseline, the primary efficacy endpoint of the study, compared with 64% (92/143) of those treated with PDT [p<0.0001]. -- Nearly 36% of patients (50/140) treated with 0.3 mg of Lucentis and 40% of patients (56/139) treated with 0.5 mg of Lucentis improved vision by a gain of 15 letters or more compared with approximately 6% of patients (8/143) treated with PDT. -- 31% of patients (44/140) treated with 0.3 mg of Lucentis and nearly 39% of patients (54/140) treated with 0.5 mg of Lucentis achieved visual acuity of 20/40 or better at 12 months compared with approximately 3% (4/143) of those treated with PDT. "Through the extensive clinical study program for Lucentis we have now shown a significant improvement in vision compared to Visudyne and in patients with all types of wet AMD," said Hal Barron, Genentech senior vice president, Development and chief medical officer. "We look forward to working with the FDA on our BLA submission and Priority Review request. Given the existing unmet medical need for patients with wet AMD, we are providing access to Lucentis for eligible patients through SAILOR, a Phase 3b safety study." In December 2005, Genentech announced that it had submitted a Biologics License Application (BLA) to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the use of Lucentis in the treatment of neovascular wet AMD. The BLA submission, which included a request for Priority (six-month) Review, is based on one-year clinical data on the efficacy and safety of Lucentis from two pivotal phase 3 trials, ANCHOR and MARINA, as well as one-year clinical data from the Phase I/II FOCUS trial. About the Study Patients were randomized 2:1 to receive intravitreal Lucentis injections (0.3 mg or 0.5 mg dose) once a month or PDT every 3 months for 2 years. Exclusion criteria included prior subfoveal laser treatment, PDT or experimental treatments for wet AMD. Visual acuity was measured using the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) chart, the standard method of quantifying visual acuity. The study is ongoing in the United States, Europe and Australia. Based on the 1-year results, patients in the PDT alone arm of the study will have access to Lucentis for the remainder of the study. Additional Phase 3 Studies SAILOR MARINA -- Twenty-five percent (59/238) of patients treated with 0.3 mg of Lucentis and 34% (81/240) treated with 0.5 mg of Lucentis improved vision by a gain of 15 letters or more compared to approximately 5% (11/238) of patients in the control group as measured by the ETDRS eye chart. -- Nearly 40% (188/478) of Lucentis-treated patients achieved a visual acuity score of 20/40 or better compared to 11% (26/238) in the control group. -- Patients treated with Lucentis gained an average of seven letters in visual acuity compared to study entry, while those in the control group lost an average of 10.5 letters. -- The majority of patients treated with Lucentis (74.8% in the 0.3 mg group and 71.3% in the 0.5 mg group) experienced a letter improvement of zero or more compared to 28.6% in the sham group. In October 2005, Genentech announced that patients in the sham arm of the MARINA study would be crossed over to active treatment with Lucentis. Additional one-year data from the MARINA study will be presented at the Macula Society Meeting in February. PIER Lucentis Safety Profile Serious ocular adverse events that occurred more frequently in the Lucentis-treated arms were uncommon and included endophthalmitis and intraocular inflammation (less than 1% for each). Among non-ocular serious adverse events, cerebral vascular events and myocardial infarctions were observed in all three arms of both the phase 3 MARINA and ANCHOR studies. The combined rate of these events in these two studies with monthly dosing was similar in the control and the 0.3 mg Lucentis arms (1.3% and 1.6% respectively) and slightly higher in the 0.5 mg Lucentis arm (2.9%). About AMD The dry form is associated with atrophic cell death of the central retina or macula, which is required for fine vision used for activities such as reading, driving or recognizing faces. The wet form is caused by growth of abnormal blood vessels, also known as choroidal neovascularization (CNV) or ocular angiogenesis, under the macula. These vessels leak fluid and blood and cause scar tissue that destroys the central retina. This results in a deterioration of sight over a period of months to years. About Lucentis About Angiogenesis The VEGF-A protein is believed to play a critical role in angiogenesis and serves as one of the key contributors to physiological or pathological conditions that can stimulate the formation of new blood vessels. The process of angiogenesis is normally regulated throughout development and adult life, and the uncontrolled growth of new blood vessels is an important contributor to a number of pathologic conditions, including wet AMD.
SOURCE: Genentech, Inc.
|