Preoperative Anaemia Diminishes Survival After Oesophagectomy for Cancer: Presented at SSO
Unregistered User
If this is not your name, click here.
Contact Us | Order Now | Journals | Bookstore | Register a colleague
 
  SEARCH  
News
Bookstore
Medline
The Web
Meetings & Congresses
Complete Doctor's Guide
 


 EXPLORE :
 news  All News
 webcasts All Webcasts
 All cases All Cases
 Meetings All Meetings & Congresses
 Medical All Medical Resources

top





New drugs / indications

English Dictionary

Medical Dictionary

Thesaurus



Warning | Privacy | Awards



 Favourite Journals 

Click here to choose your favourite journals


 Favourite Sites 

Click here to choose your favourite sites


 Languages 



  




Preoperative Anaemia Diminishes Survival After Oesophagectomy for Cancer: Presented at SSO

By Jill Stein

ST. LOUIS, Mo -- March 6, 2010 -- Preoperative anaemia is independently associated with shorter survival after oesophagectomy for cancer, researchers announced here on March 5 at the 2010 Society of Surgical Oncology Annual Cancer Symposium (SSO).

Marcovalerio Melis, MD, New York University School of Medicine, New York, New York, and colleagues measured the effects of preoperative anaemia on short-term surgical outcomes and survival in 541 patients who underwent oesophagectomy during a recent 4-year period.

“Combined modality treatment strategies are widely used for patients with oesophageal cancer,” the authors wrote in their poster presentation. “Cisplatin-based chemotherapies are routinely used preoperatively but frequently lead to anaemia.”

Preoperative anaemia has been reported to increase risks of perioperative complications and reduce survival for a variety of cancers.

Overall, 254 (49.5%) patients were anaemic preoperatively.

Anaemia was more common after neoadjuvant treatment (72% vs 41%; P = .001). Anaemia patients presented more frequently with kidney disease (4% vs 1%; P = .01) and advanced oesophageal cancer (stage III-IV, 61% vs 36%; P = .001).

Patients with anaemia were also more likely to undergo transhiatal surgery (29% vs 19%; P = .005) and perioperative blood transfusions (58% vs 44%; P = .001).

Preoperative anaemia was not associated with an increase in overall or individual symptoms.

At a median follow-up of 25 months, the 5-year overall survival and recurrence-free survival were significantly worse in anaemic patients than non-anaemic patients (34% vs 46%; P = .002, and 37% vs 45%; P = .002).

In addition, on multivariate analysis, anaemia remained a negative prognostic factor after controlling for stage, administration of neoadjuvant treatment, or blood transfusion.

The investigators said that it is still not known whether anaemia per se is the cause of decreased survival or instead represents a surrogate biological marker for aggressive disease or other adverse factors.

They added that more studies are needed to determine whether treating anaemia boosts survival.

Finally, they noted that their findings parallel earlier reports suggesting that anaemia and resulting hypoxia may favour tumour progression.

[Presentation Title: Preoperative Anemia Decreases Survival After Esophagectomy for Cancer. Abstract P178]

E-mail this page
to a friend or colleague!
To print,
use this version




Any question regarding a medical diagnosis, treatment, referral, drug availability or pricing should be directed to either a licensed physician or to the product's manufacturer.

If you have any technical questions or other concerns about this site, feel free to contact us at webmaster@docguide.com.

All contents Copyright (c) 1995- Doctor's Guide Publishing Limited. All rights reserved.


Employment opportunities | Partnering opportunities