Valve Replacement Safe for Patients With End-Stage Renal Disease on Dialysis: Presented at STS
Unregistered User
If this is not your name, click here.
Contact Us | Order Now | Journals | Bookstore | Register a colleague
 
  SEARCH  
News
Bookstore
Medline
The Web
Meetings & Congresses
Complete Doctor's Guide
 


 EXPLORE :
 news  All News
 webcasts All Webcasts
 All cases All Cases
 Meetings All Meetings & Congresses
 Medical All Medical Resources

top





New drugs / indications

English Dictionary

Medical Dictionary

Thesaurus



Warning | Privacy | Awards



 Favourite Journals 

Click here to choose your favourite journals


 Favourite Sites 

Click here to choose your favourite sites


 Languages 



  




Valve Replacement Safe for Patients With End-Stage Renal Disease on Dialysis: Presented at STS

By Charlene Laino

FORT LAUDERDALE, Fla -- January 28, 2010 -- Valve replacement with both biological and mechanical prostheses carries acceptable operative mortality in patients with end-stage renal disease on chronic dialysis, researchers stated here on January 26 at the Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) 46th Annual Meeting.

Choice of valve prosthesis should be made on an individual patient basis after careful risk assessment in this high-risk population, said Vinod H. Thourani, MD, Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Emory University Hospital Midtown, Atlanta, Georgia.

“A significant portion of patients with end-stage renal disease requiring dialysis suffer from acquired heart disease, but the choice of valve prosthesis on postoperative survival [in these patients] is not well understood,” said Dr. Thourani.

Therefore, the researchers studied mortality rates among 202 patients with end-stage renal disease who underwent 211 valve replacement surgeries between 1996 and 2007 at a US academic centre.

The mean age of the patients, 55% of whom were male, was 55 years. Of the 211 surgeries, 100 (47.4%) were isolated aortic procedures, 49 (23.2%) were isolated mitral procedures, 4 (1.9%) were isolated tricuspid procedures, and 58 (27.5%) involved combined replacements.

Thirteen (6.2%) patients underwent reoperative valve replacements.

About two-thirds of patients (139/211; 65.9%) received bioprosthetic valves, while 72 (34.1%) received mechanical valves.

Concomitant coronary artery bypass was performed in 53 (25.1%) patients.

Forty-two patients died in the first 30 days after surgery. “This corresponded to a 30-day mortality rate of 19.9%,” said Dr. Thourani.

The 30-day mortality rates among patients who received bioprosthetic valves and mechanical valves were 18.7% and 22.2%, respectively, which was not significantly different (P = .60).

Rates of myocardial infarction, stroke, pneumonia, and septicaemia also did not differ between the 2 groups.

The 10-year survival rate was 18.1% for all patients and again was not influenced by type of valve implanted: 16.9% and 20.3% for patients who received bioprosthetic valves and mechanical valves, respectively (P = NS).

[Presentation title: Long-Term Survival for Bioprosthetic Valve Replacement Is Similar to Mechanical Valve Replacement in Patients With Preoperative End Stage Renal Failure. Abstract 11]

E-mail this page
to a friend or colleague!
To print,
use this version




Any question regarding a medical diagnosis, treatment, referral, drug availability or pricing should be directed to either a licensed physician or to the product's manufacturer.

If you have any technical questions or other concerns about this site, feel free to contact us at webmaster@docguide.com.

All contents Copyright (c) 1995- Doctor's Guide Publishing Limited. All rights reserved.


Employment opportunities | Partnering opportunities