Second Arterial Conduit Improves Survival After Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: Presented at STS
Unregistered User
If this is not your name, click here.
Contact Us | Order Now | Journals | Bookstore | Register a colleague
 
  SEARCH  
News
Bookstore
Medline
The Web
Meetings & Congresses
Complete Doctor's Guide
 


 EXPLORE :
 news  All News
 webcasts All Webcasts
 All cases All Cases
 Meetings All Meetings & Congresses
 Medical All Medical Resources

top





New drugs / indications

English Dictionary

Medical Dictionary

Thesaurus



Warning | Privacy | Awards



 Favourite Journals 

Click here to choose your favourite journals


 Favourite Sites 

Click here to choose your favourite sites


 Languages 



  




Second Arterial Conduit Improves Survival After Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: Presented at STS

By Charlene Laino

FORT LAUDERDALE, Fla -- January 27, 2010 -- The use of a second arterial conduit, the radial artery, improves long-term survival after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) using the left internal thoracic artery and saphenous vein, according to a retrospective study presented here at the Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) 46th Annual Meeting.

“The use of 2 arterial conduits offers a clear and lasting survival advantage, suggesting that radial artery conduits should be more widely utilised during CABG,” said Robert F. Tranbaugh, MD, Cardiac Surgery, Beth Israel Medical Center, New York, New York, on January 26.

The researchers compared 14-year outcomes in 1,820 propensity-matched patients undergoing isolated, primary CABG using the left internal thoracic artery, the radial artery, and the saphenous vein (radial artery arm, n = 910) or the left internal thoracic artery and the saphenous vein alone (saphenous vein arm, n = 910).

The average age of the patients was 60 years, 78% were male, 39% had diabetes, and the average ejection fraction was 48%. Patients had an average of 3.7 grafts each.

The in-hospital mortality rate was 0.1% for the patients in the radial artery group versus 0.2% for the patients in whom a second arterial conduit was not used (P = NS).

The 10-year survival rate was 84% in the radial artery group, compared with 73% for the saphenous vein group (P < .0001).

In a Cox proportional hazards models, patients in the radial artery group were 40% less likely to die from any cause then patients in the saphenous vein arm (P < .0005).

There was no significant difference in the incidence of myocardial infarction, stroke, renal failure, sternal infection, and reoperations for bleeding between the 2 arms.

[Presentation title: Radial Artery Conduits Improve Long-Term Survival After Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery. Abstract 24]

E-mail this page
to a friend or colleague!
To print,
use this version




Any question regarding a medical diagnosis, treatment, referral, drug availability or pricing should be directed to either a licensed physician or to the product's manufacturer.

If you have any technical questions or other concerns about this site, feel free to contact us at webmaster@docguide.com.

All contents Copyright (c) 1995- Doctor's Guide Publishing Limited. All rights reserved.


Employment opportunities | Partnering opportunities