Breast Gamma Imaging Suggested for Cancer Detection: Presented at RSNA
Unregistered User
If this is not your name, click here.
Contact Us | Order Now | Journals | Bookstore | Register a colleague
 
  SEARCH  
News
Bookstore
Medline
The Web
Meetings & Congresses
Complete Doctor's Guide
 


 EXPLORE :
 news  All News
 webcasts All Webcasts
 All cases All Cases
 Meetings All Meetings & Congresses
 Medical All Medical Resources

top





New drugs / indications

English Dictionary

Medical Dictionary

Thesaurus



Warning | Privacy | Awards



 Favourite Journals 

Click here to choose your favourite journals


 Favourite Sites 

Click here to choose your favourite sites


 Languages 



  




Breast Gamma Imaging Suggested for Cancer Detection: Presented at RSNA

By Ed Susman

CHICAGO -- December 4, 2009 -- Researchers suggested that breast-specific gamma imaging (BSGI) could play a role in detecting cancer by assessing cell metabolism, as opposed to mammography and ultrasound, which detect anatomical abnormalities.

In a poster presentation here at the Radiological Society of North America (RSNA) 95th Annual Meeting, researchers reviewed studies performed with gamma imaging for detection of breast cancer and determined that the modality appears to be comparable to other methods.

“Breast-specific gamma imaging is a potentially powerful modality for improving breast cancer detection which will likely be integrated into clinical practice as a complementary breast imaging tool once the technology for direct biopsy using breast-specific gamma imaging is developed,” said Marina I. Feldman, MD, Maimonides Medical Center, Brooklyn, New York, in her presentation on December 3.

She said that gamma imaging may be well suited for detection of breast abnormalities among women with dense breast tissue, especially among high-risk patients for whom mammography is limited or magnetic resonance imaging is either not possible or contraindicated.

Researchers examined records of 97 patients who underwent 105 BSGI studies. Using the device, 54 studies involving 72 lesions were identified as positive. Pathology proved that 42 of the lesions were malignant and 27 were benign. Pathology follow-up is pending in 3 cases.

Dr. Feldman said that in 51 studies, the device suggested the lesions were benign. Pathology identified 49 of those lesions as benign; 2 were malignant.

“Our false-positive rate of 47.5% is comparable to that reported in the literature,” she said. False positives were later identified as fibrocystic changes, sclerosing adenosis, fibro-oedema, atypical ductal hyperplasia, fat necrosis, haematoma, or prominent dilated ducts.

In the protocol used at Maimonides Medical Center, technetium-sestamibi is injected into the hand. Bilateral imaging is conducted 5 minutes after the injection using a Dilon 6800 Breast Imaging Camera.

Because there are no commercially available systems to acquire tissue with the system, Maimonides Medical Center has been relying on various methods for biopsies, Dr. Feldman said. A commercial system is under review by the US Food and Drug Administration, she said.

[Presentation title: The Role for Breast-Specific Gamma Imaging: Experience of a Community Medical Center. Abstract LL-BR5202]


E-mail this page
to a friend or colleague!
To print,
use this version




Any question regarding a medical diagnosis, treatment, referral, drug availability or pricing should be directed to either a licensed physician or to the product's manufacturer.

If you have any technical questions or other concerns about this site, feel free to contact us at webmaster@docguide.com.

All contents Copyright (c) 1995- Doctor's Guide Publishing Limited. All rights reserved.


Employment opportunities | Partnering opportunities