Catheter Ablation Superior to Antiarrhythmic Drugs in Treating Atrial Fibrillation: Presented at AHA
Unregistered User
If this is not your name, click here.
Contact Us | Order Now | Journals | Bookstore | Register a colleague
 
  SEARCH  
News
Bookstore
Medline
The Web
Meetings & Congresses
Complete Doctor's Guide
 


 EXPLORE :
 news  All News
 webcasts All Webcasts
 All cases All Cases
 Meetings All Meetings & Congresses
 Medical All Medical Resources

top





New drugs / indications

English Dictionary

Medical Dictionary

Thesaurus



Warning | Privacy | Awards



 Favourite Journals 

Click here to choose your favourite journals


 Favourite Sites 

Click here to choose your favourite sites


 Languages 



  




Catheter Ablation Superior to Antiarrhythmic Drugs in Treating Atrial Fibrillation: Presented at AHA

By Deborah Brauser

ORLANDO, Fla -- November 25, 2009 -- Circumferential pulmonary vein ablation is superior to antiarrhythmic drug therapy over the long term in patients with symptomatic paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF), according to a prospective follow-up study presented here at the American Heart Association (AHA) Scientific Sessions 2009.

The results were presented on November 16 by Vincenzo Santinelli, MD, San Raffaele University Hospital, Milan, Italy.

In the original Ablation for Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation (APAF)-2 trial, 198 patients with AF (mean age, 56 years) were randomly assigned to receive catheter ablation (n = 99) or antiarrhythmic drugs (n = 99).

For the current study, outcomes evaluated included efficacy, quality of life, crossovers, and arrhythmia progression at a 4-year follow-up.

“The superiority that was shown at 1 year for the catheter ablation treatment was maintained up to 4 years, despite a large number of crossovers from antiarrhythmic drugs to catheter ablation [87.9%] during the follow-up period,” reported Dr. Santinelli.

A total of 90 patients treated with catheter ablation and 80 with antiarrhythmic drugs maintained sinus rhythm (P = .023). Out of all the patients, only 3 progressed to permanent AF.

The patients who underwent catheter ablation also had significantly fewer cardiovascular hospitalisations and higher quality-of-life scores at the follow-up (P < .01).

“Many of the patients on antiarrhythmic drug therapy who did not cross to catheter ablation experienced arrhythmia progression from recurrent episodes of AF,” said Dr. Santinelli. This led to frequent hospitalisations for electrical cardioversion and acute pulmonary oedema episodes.

No thromboembolic events were reported in either group.

“These data indicate that an early catheter ablation strategy is preferable in terms of efficacy, adverse events, quality of life, and arrhythmia progression,” said Dr. Santinelli.

[Presentation title: Early Rhythm Control Strategy by Catheter Ablation in Patients With Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation: The 4-Year Results of a Randomized Follow-Up Study Comparing Catheter Ablation and Antiarrhythmic Drug Therapy: The APAF 2 Study. Abstract 2542]

E-mail this page
to a friend or colleague!
To print,
use this version




Any question regarding a medical diagnosis, treatment, referral, drug availability or pricing should be directed to either a licensed physician or to the product's manufacturer.

If you have any technical questions or other concerns about this site, feel free to contact us at webmaster@docguide.com.

All contents Copyright (c) 1995- Doctor's Guide Publishing Limited. All rights reserved.


Employment opportunities | Partnering opportunities