Type 1 Diabetes Patients Achieve Lower Hypoglycaemia With Insulin Detemir Treatment Than NPH Insulin: Presented at EASD
Unregistered User
If this is not your name, click here.
Contact Us | Order Now | Journals | Bookstore | Register a colleague
 
  SEARCH  
News
Bookstore
Medline
The Web
Meetings & Congresses
Complete Doctor's Guide
 


 EXPLORE :
 news  All News
 webcasts All Webcasts
 All cases All Cases
 Meetings All Meetings & Congresses
 Medical All Medical Resources

top





New drugs / indications

English Dictionary

Medical Dictionary

Thesaurus



Warning | Privacy | Awards



 Favourite Journals 

Click here to choose your favourite journals


 Favourite Sites 

Click here to choose your favourite sites


 Languages 



  




Type 1 Diabetes Patients Achieve Lower Hypoglycaemia With Insulin Detemir Treatment Than NPH Insulin: Presented at EASD

By Bruce Sylvester

VIENNA, Austria -- October 7, 2009 -- In a new meta-analysis of 7 trials, type 1 diabetic patients treated with insulin detemir achieved a lower rate of hypoglycaemia than and similar glycaemic control (haemoglobin [Hb] A1C) to patients treated with Neutral Protamine Hagedorn (NPH) insulin, according to findings presented here at the 45th Annual Meeting of the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD).

“In a basal-bolus regimen in subjects with type 1 diabetes, the rate of hypoglycaemia was significantly lower with insulin detemir than with a corresponding regimen of NPH,” said Kjeld Hermansen, MD, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark, at a presentation on October 1.

As background, the researchers noted that clinical trials usually focus on efficacy, and such trials are usually not powered for analysis of differences in hypoglycaemia between the treatment arms.

The researchers performed a meta-analysis to determine the relationship between glycaemic control on treatment and hypoglycaemia in patients with type 1 diabetes. Patients were treated with either insulin detemir or NPH insulin once or twice daily, which was the basal component of a basal-bolus therapy.

Data were gathered from 7 randomised clinical trials for which individual patient data were available. The trials lasted >16 weeks and were reported by March 2008.

The study included 1,801 subjects on insulin detemir and 1,080 on NPH insulin. Patient characteristics were comparable between the groups: male, 57.9% and 58.5% for the insulin detemir and NPH insulin groups, respectively; mean age, 39.4 and 39.2 years; mean duration of diabetes, 15.6 and 15.1 years; mean body mass index 24.8 and 24.9 mg/m2; and mean Hb A1C at baseline, 8.3% and 8.2%. Patients were treated for 16-104 weeks.

The investigators used standard statistical tools to analyse and compare the number of hypoglycaemic episodes during the last 90 days of treatment. They reported that the risk of hypoglycaemia was statistically significantly lower with insulin detemir than with NPH insulin (relative rate = 0.81; P < .001). Independent of Hb A1C, the risk of hypoglycaemia with insulin detemir was 19% lower than with NPH.

The investigators also reported that the rate of hypoglycaemia was inversely related to end-of-trial Hb A1C in both regimens, and a 1% decrease in Hb A1C was associated with a 24% increase in the rate of hypoglycaemia.

The researchers concluded that compared with NPH insulin, insulin detemir was associated with a lower rate of hypoglycaemia at all levels of glycaemic control.

Funding for this study was provided by Novo Nordisk A/S.

[Presentation title: Lower Rate of Hypoglycaemia but Comparable Glycaemic Control With Insulin Detemir Compared to NPH Insulin in Patients With Type 1 Diabetes. Abstract 914]


E-mail this page
to a friend or colleague!
To print,
use this version




Any question regarding a medical diagnosis, treatment, referral, drug availability or pricing should be directed to either a licensed physician or to the product's manufacturer.

If you have any technical questions or other concerns about this site, feel free to contact us at webmaster@docguide.com.

All contents Copyright (c) 1995- Doctor's Guide Publishing Limited. All rights reserved.


Employment opportunities | Partnering opportunities