NASS: Air Bags And Safety Belts Best Protection From Cervical-Spine Injury
Unregistered User
If this is not your name, click here.
Contact Us | Order Now | Journals | Bookstore | Register a colleague
 
  SEARCH  
News
Bookstore
Medline
The Web
Meetings & Congresses
Complete Doctor's Guide
 


 EXPLORE :
 news  All News
 webcasts All Webcasts
 All cases All Cases
 Meetings All Meetings & Congresses
 Medical All Medical Resources

top





New drugs / indications

English Dictionary

Medical Dictionary

Thesaurus



Warning | Privacy | Awards



 Favourite Journals 

Click here to choose your favourite journals


 Favourite Sites 

Click here to choose your favourite sites


 Languages 



  




NASS: Air Bags And Safety Belts Best Protection From Cervical-Spine Injury

By Maury M. Breecher, PhD, MPH

SAN DIEGO, CA -- November 7, 2003 -- The combination of airbags and seatbelts, when used by auto passengers and the driver, provide better protection against cervical-spine injury than just seatbelts alone, according to a study presented here October 22nd at the 18th Meeting of the North American Spine Society.

Five researchers from University of Alabama-Birmingham, United States, performed a case-control study of 8,412 cases of cervical-spine injury from 1995 to 2001. The authors pointed out that, "Although advances in automobile crashworthiness have reduced both fatalities and some severe injuries, the impact of varying occupant restraint systems (seatbelts and airbags) on cervical-spine injury is unknown."

Motor-vehicle-collision-related cervical-spine injury is a severe and often permanently disabling injury. Data were collected from the National Automobile Sampling System to determine whether victims of such injuries were wearing seatbelts at the time of injury, and whether they were traveling in cars with airbags.

Approximately half (44.7%) of the cases examined occurred to occupants in 1 of 3 categories: seat-belted only, airbag-use only, or both restraint systems active. Of those injured, 38.2% wore seatbelts in cars without airbags; 8.8% were in cars with airbags, but didn't wear seatbelts; and 8.4% were wearing seatbelts and were in cars with working air bags.

Overall, the combined use of airbag and seatbelt had the greatest protective effect, relative to unrestrained occupants, with an odds ratio (OR) of 0.19 and a 95% confidence interval (CI) of 0.12 to 0.30, the authors reported. Use of a seatbelt only also had a protective effect (OR=0.40, 95% CI=0.23 to 0.70). Occupant use of an airbag only neither increased nor decreased the risk of cervical-spine injuries relative to unrestrained occupants (OR=1.02, 95% CI=0.57 to 2.13).

"The results of this study suggest that there is an increase in overall protection against cervical-spine injury by combining airbag and seatbelt restraint systems relative to seatbelt alone," concluded Brian Claytor, MD, Paul MacLennan, PhD, Gerald McGwin, Jr., PhD, Loring Rue, MD, and John Kirkpatrick, MD.

E-mail this page
to a friend or colleague!
To print,
use this version




Any question regarding a medical diagnosis, treatment, referral, drug availability or pricing should be directed to either a licensed physician or to the product's manufacturer.

If you have any technical questions or other concerns about this site, feel free to contact us at webmaster@docguide.com.

All contents Copyright (c) 1995- Doctor's Guide Publishing Limited. All rights reserved.


Employment opportunities | Partnering opportunities