Laparoscopic Uterosacral Nerve Ablation Ineffective for Alleviating Chronic Pelvic Pain
Unregistered User
If this is not your name, click here.
Contact Us | Order Now | Journals | Bookstore | Register a colleague
 
  SEARCH  
News
Bookstore
Medline
The Web
Meetings & Congresses
Complete Doctor's Guide
 


 EXPLORE :
 news  All News
 webcasts All Webcasts
 All cases All Cases
 Meetings All Meetings & Congresses
 Medical All Medical Resources

top





New drugs / indications

English Dictionary

Medical Dictionary

Thesaurus



Warning | Privacy | Awards



 Favourite Journals 

Click here to choose your favourite journals


 Favourite Sites 

Click here to choose your favourite sites


 Languages 



  




Laparoscopic Uterosacral Nerve Ablation Ineffective for Alleviating Chronic Pelvic Pain

CHICAGO -- September 2, 2009 -- Laparoscopic uterosacral nerve ablation (LUNA) does not result in improvements in chronic pelvic pain, painful menstruation, painful sexual intercourse or quality of life when compared with laparoscopic surgery that does not interrupt pelvic nerve connections, according to a study published in the September 2 issue of JAMA.

“Chronic pelvic pain in women is as common as asthma and chronic back pain, is one of the most difficult and perplexing of women’s health problems and has a multifactorial etiology,” the authors wrote. “Chronic pelvic pain has a major effect on health-related quality of life, work attendance and productivity, and health care use, and treatments for chronic pelvic pain are often unsatisfactory.”

“LUNA was adopted by many practitioners because afferent nerves from pelvic organs pass through the utero-sacral ligament and it was thought that disruption of these would reduce the perceived pain.”

Jane Daniels, Birmingham Women’s Hospital, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom, and colleagues from the LUNA Trial Collaboration conducted a randomised controlled study with 487 women with chronic pelvic pain at 18 hospitals in the United Kingdom between February 1998 and December 2005.

The women were randomised to receive the LUNA procedure (n = 243) or laparoscopy without pelvic denervation (n = 244). Follow-up questionnaires were sent to study participants at 3 and 6 months and at 1, 2, 3, and 5 years.

The primary outcome was pain and the secondary outcome was health-related quality of life.

“After a median follow-up of 69 months, there were no significant differences reported on the visual analogue pain scales for the worst pain between the LUNA group and the no LUNA group,” the authors found. There were also no significant differences found for noncyclical pain, dysmenorrhea, or dyspareunia. Nor were there differences observed between the LUNA group and the no LUNA group for quality of life.

“The LUNA trial was designed to assess the effects of LUNA compared with no denervation among women undergoing diagnostic laparoscopy for chronic pelvic pain. LUNA did not alleviate any type of pain or improve the quality of life, irrespective of the presence or absence of mild endometriosis,” the authors concluded.

SOURCE: JAMA

E-mail this page
to a friend or colleague!
To print,
use this version




Any question regarding a medical diagnosis, treatment, referral, drug availability or pricing should be directed to either a licensed physician or to the product's manufacturer.

If you have any technical questions or other concerns about this site, feel free to contact us at webmaster@docguide.com.

All contents Copyright (c) 1995- Doctor's Guide Publishing Limited. All rights reserved.


Employment opportunities | Partnering opportunities