DisCoVisc a Safe Alternative to Healon Viscoelastic Device in Cataract Surgery: Presented at COS
Unregistered User
If this is not your name, click here.
Contact Us | Order Now | Journals | Bookstore | Register a colleague
 
  SEARCH  
News
Bookstore
Medline
The Web
Meetings & Congresses
Complete Doctor's Guide
 


 EXPLORE :
 news  All News
 webcasts All Webcasts
 All cases All Cases
 Meetings All Meetings & Congresses
 Medical All Medical Resources

top





New drugs / indications

English Dictionary

Medical Dictionary

Thesaurus



Warning | Privacy | Awards



 Favourite Journals 

Click here to choose your favourite journals


 Favourite Sites 

Click here to choose your favourite sites


 Languages 



  




DisCoVisc a Safe Alternative to Healon Viscoelastic Device in Cataract Surgery: Presented at COS

By Louise Gagnon

TORONTO -- July 1, 2009 -- The DisCoVisc ophthalmic surgery device can be used as an alternative to the Healon viscoelastic device in cataract surgery, according to a study presented here at the 72nd Annual Meeting and Exhibition of the Canadian Ophthalmological Society (COS).

"We would use DisCoVisc in situations where we want to provide more endothelial protection to the eye," explained Stanley Chan, MD, Department of Ophthalmology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta.

A total of 33 eyes of 21 patients were randomised to cataract surgery: 19 eyes to the Healon device and 14 to DisCoVisc.

Researchers documented surgical factors such as phacoemulsification time, total case time, subjective surgical performance, and surgical complications.

No significant surgical complications occurred with either surgical device, according to Dr. Chan.

Corneal pachymetry rose the first day after surgery by an average of 33 microns in the DisCoVisc group versus 48 microns in the Healon group.

At day 15, a relative increase in corneal thickness remained among patients who were subjected to the Healon device (18 microns) compared with those subjected to the DisCoVisc (4 microns).

Less loss of endothelial cell density was found in DisCoVisc group at day 15: average loss 294 cells/mm2 (11.5%) with DisCoVisc versus 470 cells/mm2 (17.9%) with the Healon device.

Patients did not make any subjective assessments that indicated a difference between the devices, noted Dr. Chan.

However, surgeons indicated subjectively that using the DisCoVisc device during phacoemulsification was superior to using the Healon device.

"From a surgical standpoint, there was significant improvement in the retention of viscoelastic with DisCoVisc," said Dr. Chan.
On the other hand, the investigators found that the Healon device was easier to remove at the end of surgery.

More study is needed to confirm the positive impact of using the DisCoVisc device on endothelial cell density and corneal thickness, said Dr. Chan.

[Presentation title: Comparison of Healon Versus DisCoVisc for Cataract Surgery. Abstract P12]

E-mail this page
to a friend or colleague!
To print,
use this version




Any question regarding a medical diagnosis, treatment, referral, drug availability or pricing should be directed to either a licensed physician or to the product's manufacturer.

If you have any technical questions or other concerns about this site, feel free to contact us at webmaster@docguide.com.

All contents Copyright (c) 1995- Doctor's Guide Publishing Limited. All rights reserved.


Employment opportunities | Partnering opportunities