Tanezumab Appears Effective in Relieving Chronic Low Back Pain Compared With Placebo: Presented at APS
Unregistered User
If this is not your name, click here.
Contact Us | Order Now | Journals | Bookstore | Register a colleague
 
  SEARCH  
News
Bookstore
Medline
The Web
Meetings & Congresses
Complete Doctor's Guide
 


 EXPLORE :
 news  All News
 webcasts All Webcasts
 All cases All Cases
 Meetings All Meetings & Congresses
 Medical All Medical Resources

top





New drugs / indications

English Dictionary

Medical Dictionary

Thesaurus



Warning | Privacy | Awards



 Favourite Journals 

Click here to choose your favourite journals


 Favourite Sites 

Click here to choose your favourite sites


 Languages 



  




Tanezumab Appears Effective in Relieving Chronic Low Back Pain Compared With Placebo: Presented at APS

By Kristina Rebelo

SAN DIEGO -- May 15, 2009 -- Compared with placebo, tanezumab provides statistically significant and clinical meaningful effects in patients with persistent low back pain (LBP), researchers stated here at the 28th Annual Scientific Meeting of the American Pain Society (APS).

Study results, presented on May 8, showed that a single intravenous (IV) infusion of tanezumab was significantly superior to naproxen and placebo in its analgesic efficacy in patients with LBP over a 12-week period, and had an acceptable safety profile.

Nathaniel Katz, MD, Analgesic Research, Needham, Massachusetts, and Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, and colleagues enrolled patients with chronic nonradiculopathic LBP for more than 3 months prior to screening that required regular analgesic medication use.

The primary location for patients' LBP was between the twelfth thoracic vertebra and the lower gluteal folds. The pain was classified by the Quebec Task Force in Spinal Disorders as Category 1 or 2, corresponding to pain without radiation or pain with proximal radiation.

Patients were randomised to 1 of 3 groups: (1) tanezumab 200 mcg/kg IV and an oral placebo on day 1 (n = 88); (2) placebo IV and oral naproxen 500 mg BID, days 1-85 (n = 88); or (3) IV and oral placebo (n = 41).

The primary outcome was average Low Back Pain Intensity (aLBPI; scale of 0-10) scores at week 6. Secondary outcomes included treatment response (>=30% or >=50% reduction in aLBPI) and Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire score (RMDQS).

Mean baseline characteristics were similar across groups (aged 50-52 years; aLBPI 6.5-6.7).

Using a predefined repeated measures analysis, mean change in aLBPI from baseline to week 6 was greater with tanezumab (-3.37) versus naproxen (-2.54; P = .004) and placebo (-1.96; P < .001).

Tanezumab was associated with significant improvements in >=50% treatment response (57%) versus naproxen (34%; P = .002) and placebo (20%; P < .001), and in RMDQS (-7.70) versus naproxen (-4.69; P < .001) and placebo (-3.93; P < .001).

Study medications were well tolerated with few patients discontinuing the study due to adverse events (AEs). AEs did cause the discontinuation of 4.5% of patients in the tanezumab group; 3.4% of patients in the naproxen group; and 4.9% of patients in the placebo group.

Altered peripheral sensation AEs were reported in 11.4% (tanezumab); 3.4% (naproxen); and 2.4% (placebo) of patients. One patient in the tanezumab group had an AE of peripheral neuropathy and hyperesthesia; however, both resolved before the end of the study. This patient was examined by a consulting neurologist who found no evidence of peripheral neuropathy.

Funding for this study was provided by Pfizer, Inc.

[Presentation title: Tanezumab, an Anti-Nerve Growth Factor (NGF) Antibody, for the Treatment of Chronic Low Back Pain (CLBP) -- A Randomized, Controlled, Double-Blind, Phase 2 Trial. Abstract 227]

E-mail this page
to a friend or colleague!
To print,
use this version




Any question regarding a medical diagnosis, treatment, referral, drug availability or pricing should be directed to either a licensed physician or to the product's manufacturer.

If you have any technical questions or other concerns about this site, feel free to contact us at webmaster@docguide.com.

All contents Copyright (c) 1995- Doctor's Guide Publishing Limited. All rights reserved.


Employment opportunities | Partnering opportunities