Unregistered User If this is not your name, click here.
		Contact Us | Order Now | Journals | Bookstore | Register a colleague
	Select a ChannelAcneAIDS and HIVAllergy OtherAlzheimer'sAnaesthesiology OtherAngina Pectoris/MIAnxietyArthritis OtherAsthmaBack PainBacterial InfectionsBladder CancerBone Marrow TransplantationBreast CancerCardiology OtherCataractCell TransplantationCervical CancerCholesterol/Lipid disordersCirrhosisClinical PharmacologyColorectal CancerCongestive Heart FailureContact DermatitisContraceptionCOPDCystic FibrosisDental and Oral DisordersDepressionDermatology OtherDiabetesDialysisEating DisordersElbowEmergency MedicineEndocrinology OtherEpilepsyErectile DysfunctionFibromyalgiaGastro OtherGeneticsGenitourinary OtherGeriatricsGERD/GastritisGlaucomaH. Pylori/UlcerHaematology OtherHair LossHeadachesHepa/Biliary OtherHepatitisHipHRTHypertensionIBDImmunologyInfectious OtherInfertilityIntensive CareIrritable Bowel SyndromeKneeLeukemiasLiver CancerLung CancerLupusLymphomasMelanomaMenopauseMultiple Sclerosis Nephrology OtherNeurologic OtherNutritional / Metabolic OtherOb/Gyn OtherObesityOncology OtherOphth. OtherOphthalmic SurgeryOrgan TransplantationOrthopaedics OtherOsteoarthritisOsteoporosisOtitisOtorhino. OtherOvarian CancerPaediatricsPainPancreatic CancerParkinson'sPregnancyProstate CancerPsychiatry OtherPulmonary OtherRadiologyRenal CancerRenal FailureRespiratory InfectionsRheumatoid arthritisRheumatology OtherRhinitisSchizophreniaShoulderSleep ApnoeaSleep DisordersSpineStrokeSTDsSurgeryThyroid DisordersTransfusionTransplant Surgery OtherTraumaUrinary IncontinenceUrinary tract infectionsVaccinologyVascular DisordersViral Infections

SEARCH   News Bookstore Medline The Web Meetings & Congresses Complete Doctor's Guide    EXPLORE :    All News   All Webcasts   All Cases   All Meetings & Congresses   All Medical Resources New drugs / indications English Dictionary Medical Dictionary Thesaurus Warning | Privacy | Awards  Favourite Journals  Click here to choose your favourite journals  Favourite Sites  Click here to choose your favourite sites  Languages  Select languageEnglishFrançais

ARRS: Whole Body Magnetic Resonance Imaging Could Replace Bone Scans In Cancer Patients SAN DIEGO, CA -- May 7, 2003 -- Whole body magnetic resonance imaging is superior to bone scans in determining how far cancer has spread into the bone marrow and bones, a new study shows. The study compared whole body MR imaging and bone scans in the detection of bone metastases in patients with solid tumors, says Nadir Ghanem, MD, a resident at University Hospital Freiburg, department of diagnostic radiology, in Germany. The study is co-authored by Mathias Langer, MD, chair of the department of radiology. The MR examinations were performed using a rolling table platform, a so-called "bodysurf" which allowed for a broader view; the patients could be imaged nearly head to toe in a relatively short time, says Dr. Ghanem. In 40 out of the 98 patients studied, skeletal metastatic disease was detected with both whole body MR imaging and a bone scan, says Dr. Ghanem. In 21 of these patients, MR imaging showed more extensive disease compared to bone scans, says Dr. Ghanem. In six patients, the bone scan showed more extensive disease in the arms, legs, and ribs, he notes. In 11 cases MR imaging detected skeletal metastases, but bone scans were negative. In 80 of the 98 patients studied, MR imaging "yielded additional morphological information about the primary tumor, lymph node involvement, and visceral and soft tissue metastases," says Dr. Ghanem. "Whole body MR imaging was outstanding in predicting possible complications, such as fractures," says Dr. Ghanem. Whole-body FDG-PET was performed on 45 of the 98 patients, says Dr. Ghanem. In 19 of the 45 patients the findings of MR imaging and PET were negative, and in 10 of these 45 both imaging techniques detected skeletal metastases, he says. However, in seven of the 10 patients with skeletal metastases, MR imaging was able to show more extensive metastatic disease. In six patients, the findings were not in agreement, and in five of these cases MR imaging was positive, while PET was negative. The positive MR imaging findings were proven by clinical follow-up, says Dr. Ghanem. The MR examination takes less than 10 minutes; bone scans take between 15-20 minutes and PET scans of the entire body take 90 minutes, he says. In addition, the MR examination requires no radiation (no contrast media was used either); bone scans and PET scans require the use of a radioisotope. "This particular study included 98 patients, but we have done more than 250 investigations using whole body MR imaging combined with a rolling table platform," says Dr. Ghanem. The study will be presented today during the American Roentgen Ray Society Annual Meeting in San Diego. SOURCE: American Roentgen Ray Society E-mail this page to a friend or colleague! To print, use this version