Unregistered User If this is not your name, click here.
		Contact Us | Order Now | Journals | Bookstore | Register a colleague
	Select a ChannelAcneAIDS and HIVAllergy OtherAlzheimer'sAnaesthesiology OtherAngina Pectoris/MIAnxietyArthritis OtherAsthmaBack PainBacterial InfectionsBladder CancerBone Marrow TransplantationBreast CancerCardiology OtherCataractCell TransplantationCervical CancerCholesterol/Lipid disordersCirrhosisClinical PharmacologyColorectal CancerCongestive Heart FailureContact DermatitisContraceptionCOPDCystic FibrosisDental and Oral DisordersDepressionDermatology OtherDiabetesDialysisEating DisordersElbowEmergency MedicineEndocrinology OtherEpilepsyErectile DysfunctionFibromyalgiaGastro OtherGeneticsGenitourinary OtherGeriatricsGERD/GastritisGlaucomaH. Pylori/UlcerHaematology OtherHair LossHeadachesHepa/Biliary OtherHepatitisHipHRTHypertensionIBDImmunologyInfectious OtherInfertilityIntensive CareIrritable Bowel SyndromeKneeLeukemiasLiver CancerLung CancerLupusLymphomasMelanomaMenopauseMultiple Sclerosis Nephrology OtherNeurologic OtherNutritional / Metabolic OtherOb/Gyn OtherObesityOncology OtherOphth. OtherOphthalmic SurgeryOrgan TransplantationOrthopaedics OtherOsteoarthritisOsteoporosisOtitisOtorhino. OtherOvarian CancerPaediatricsPainPancreatic CancerParkinson'sPregnancyProstate CancerPsychiatry OtherPulmonary OtherRadiologyRenal CancerRenal FailureRespiratory InfectionsRheumatoid arthritisRheumatology OtherRhinitisSchizophreniaShoulderSleep ApnoeaSleep DisordersSpineStrokeSTDsSurgeryThyroid DisordersTransfusionTransplant Surgery OtherTraumaUrinary IncontinenceUrinary tract infectionsVaccinologyVascular DisordersViral Infections

SEARCH   News Bookstore Medline The Web Meetings & Congresses Complete Doctor's Guide    EXPLORE :    All News   All Webcasts   All Cases   All Meetings & Congresses   All Medical Resources New drugs / indications English Dictionary Medical Dictionary Thesaurus Warning | Privacy | Awards  Favourite Journals  Click here to choose your favourite journals  Favourite Sites  Click here to choose your favourite sites  Languages  Select languageEnglishFrançais

Approved Drugs Used in Children Requires Closer Monitoring, Reporting of Adverse Events DURHAM, NC -- September 3, 2008 -- The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Modernization Act (1997), designed to stimulate more drug safety studies in children, has resulted in more than 130 label changes since its inception nearly 6 years ago, according to a study in the September issue of Pediatrics. Under this and subsequent renewal of this legislation, pharmaceutical companies were given a 6-month extension of their exclusive marketing rights on a drug if they performed clinical trials requested by the FDA to determine the drugs' safety, dosing, and efficacy in children. According to lead author P. Brian Smith, MD, Department of Pediatrics, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, many safety concerns cannot be detected until after the introduction of a product to a larger and more diverse population. The Best Pharmaceuticals for Children Act (2002) required the FDA to review and report to a public expert panel the adverse events occurring after granting paediatric exclusivity. That effort was needed because paediatric clinical trials are notoriously small, making it more likely that some safety concerns would not be detected until after the drug is used in a larger paediatric population. Using MedWatch, the FDA's computerised information database for collecting reports of adverse events, the FDA's Pediatric Advisory Committee reviewed 67 drugs granted the extension. "This is a voluntary, cost-effective reporting system that can identify adverse events that may never have been seen in a clinical trial," Dr. Smith said. "Just because a drug goes through testing and clinical trials does not mean its entire safety profile is known," said co-author Danny Benjamin, MD, Duke Children's Hospital. "Before this incentive, there was no systematic, focused paediatric review of the data provided to the FDA's adverse event reporting system. Now, field experts in paediatrics are evaluating the data. That's what's so unique about this effort." The majority of the 67 drugs studied (65.7%) did not appear to cause enough adverse events to require continued paediatric monitoring. However, nearly 1 in 5 drugs studied required label changes consisting of additional warnings and cautions for use in children, and several of the adverse events revealed during this process were considered life threatening. Some of those labelling changes included: · Black Box warning and development of patient information for selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) regarding potential for suicidality and neonatal toxicity/withdrawal syndrome. · Box warning for transdermal opioid analgesics (Duragesic) alerting that inappropriate use may result in serious adverse reactions, including death. · Labelling change for methylphenidate (Concerta) to address the potential for psychiatric events. The Duke researchers say their findings support the approach that paediatric postmarketing surveillance is crucial, and that physicians, nurses, parents, and others should take the job of reporting adverse effects seriously. Very rare serious adverse events are seldom defined during a study of a few hundred children and learning about these events is often dependent on the reporting of them from caretakers and parents. "Unfortunately, few clinicians and patients know this reporting system exists," said Dr. Smith. "In the Duke Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, the pharmacist reports adverse drug events to MedWatch. But I'm not sure that happens at every hospital. A lot of physicians don't know it's available. This publication is somewhat of an advertisement that this program is available." SOURCE: Duke University Medical Center E-mail this page to a friend or colleague! To print, use this version