Atazanavir/Ritonavir as Effective as Lopinavir/Ritonavir in HIV Treatment-Naive Patients
Unregistered User
If this is not your name, click here.
Contact Us | Order Now | Journals | Bookstore | Register a colleague
 
  SEARCH  
News
Bookstore
Medline
The Web
Meetings & Congresses
Complete Doctor's Guide
 


 EXPLORE :
 news  All News
 webcasts All Webcasts
 All cases All Cases
 Meetings All Meetings & Congresses
 Medical All Medical Resources

top





New drugs / indications

English Dictionary

Medical Dictionary

Thesaurus



Warning | Privacy | Awards



 Favourite Journals 

Click here to choose your favourite journals


 Favourite Sites 

Click here to choose your favourite sites


 Languages 



  




Atazanavir/Ritonavir as Effective as Lopinavir/Ritonavir in HIV Treatment-Naive Patients

NEW YORK -- August 1, 2008 -- In HIV treatment-naïve patients, atazanavir/ritonavir (A/R) QD shows similar antiviral efficacy to lopinavir/ritonavir (L/R) BID, according to a study published early online in the August 2 edition of The Lancet.

The authors of the CASTLE study recommend that once-daily A/R should be a first-line treatment option for these patients as it has a number of advantages over the currently recommended twice-daily L/R.

Professor Jean-Michel Molina, Hopital Saint-Louis, Paris, France; Graeme Moyle, MD, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital, London, United Kingdom; and colleagues did a study of 883 antiretroviral-naïve, HIV infected patients.

Patients were randomised to receive A/R 300/100 mg QD (n = 440) or L/R 400/100 mg BID (n = 443). Both regimens were in combination with tenofovir/emtricitabine 300/200 mg QD. The percentage of patients with viral load <50 copies/mL was measured at 48 weeks.

The researchers found that 78% of patients receiving A/R and 76% of those receiving L/R had achieved the target viral load <50 copies/mL by week 48. CD4 cell counts increased by 203 cells/mcL in the A/R group and by 219 cells/mcL in the L/R group.

In both groups, 6% of patients experienced treatment failure by the end of the study; 2 patients developed resistance mutations to treatment in the A/R group compared with none in the L/R group.

Serious adverse events occurred in 12% of A/R patients and 10% of L/R patients. However, fewer patients in the A/R group compared with the L/R group experienced treatment-related diarrhoea (2% vs 11%) and nausea (4% vs 8%).

Jaundice was seen in 4% of patients in the A/R group, while none was observed in the L/R group. Increases in bilirubin were seen in 34% of patients in the A/R group but in less than 1% of patients in the L/R group.

"In treatment-naïve patients, atazanavir/ritonavir once-daily demonstrated similar antiviral efficacy to lopinavir/ritonavir twice daily, with less gastrointestinal toxicity but with a higher rate of hyperbilirubinaemia," the authors wrote.

The authors added that the results of this study support the use of once-daily A/R as a recommended first-line treatment option, with a number of patient benefits over the currently recommended ritonavir-boosted twice-daily lopinavir for the treatment of HIV-infected antiretroviral-naïve patients.

SOURCE: The Lancet

E-mail this page
to a friend or colleague!
To print,
use this version




Any question regarding a medical diagnosis, treatment, referral, drug availability or pricing should be directed to either a licensed physician or to the product's manufacturer.

If you have any technical questions or other concerns about this site, feel free to contact us at webmaster@docguide.com.

All contents Copyright (c) 1995- Doctor's Guide Publishing Limited. All rights reserved.


Employment opportunities | Partnering opportunities