Small Bedside Monitors Detect Seizures in At-Risk Newborns
Unregistered User
If this is not your name, click here.
Contact Us | Order Now | Journals | Bookstore | Register a colleague
 
  SEARCH  
News
Bookstore
Medline
The Web
Meetings & Congresses
Complete Doctor's Guide
 


 EXPLORE :
 news  All News
 webcasts All Webcasts
 All cases All Cases
 Meetings All Meetings & Congresses
 Medical All Medical Resources

top





New drugs / indications

English Dictionary

Medical Dictionary

Thesaurus



Warning | Privacy | Awards



 Favourite Journals 

Click here to choose your favourite journals


 Favourite Sites 

Click here to choose your favourite sites


 Languages 



  




Small Bedside Monitors Detect Seizures in At-Risk Newborns

ST. LOUIS, Mo -- July 2, 2008 -- Compact, bedside, amplitude-integrated electroencephalographic (aEEG) monitors are able to detect most seizures in at-risk infants, which could assist clinicians in monitoring for electrical seizures until confirmation with a conventional electroencephalography (EEG), according to a study published in the June issue of Pediatrics.

Researchers at Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, conducted a side-by-side comparison of aEEG with conventional EEG. They used both technologies simultaneously for an average of 18 hours per patient to monitor the brain activity of 21 newborns who had experienced seizures.

They also compared 3 different aEEG setups: (1) produced a tracing from only 1 channel, (2) produced tracings from 2 channels, and (3) produced tracings from 2 channels but also included raw, uncompressed brain-wave tracings.

"We found that we could pick up seizure activity in most of the patients using aEEG monitors that included the raw signals," said lead author Divyen Shah, MD. "In most medical centres worldwide, conventional EEG isn't available because it's expensive and resource intensive. We've shown that when staff members have training in interpreting aEEG, it can be effective for monitoring electrical seizure activity in newborns."

With conventional EEG, the researchers detected multiple seizures in 7 of the infants, and with aEEG plus the raw signals, they detected most of those seizures (76%) in 6 of those babies. The seventh baby had 1 brief seizure, which was missed by aEEG monitoring.

Although aEEG has the advantage of lower cost and ease of use, the study also showed that its compression of raw brain wave data can make certain types of seizures harder to detect. However, the research also demonstrated that this disadvantage can be largely overcome with the use of aEEG monitors that also output an uncompressed and unfiltered tracing. That raw tracing provides a backup reading to check against any ambiguous reading from the compressed data.

The researchers found that aEEG plus the raw signals yielded better results than unsupplemented aEEG, which missed all of 5 seizures experienced by 1 of the newborns. The research team emphasises that although aEEG monitors can complement conventional EEG, they cannot completely replace it for electrical seizure detection.

SOURCE: Washington University

E-mail this page
to a friend or colleague!
To print,
use this version




Any question regarding a medical diagnosis, treatment, referral, drug availability or pricing should be directed to either a licensed physician or to the product's manufacturer.

If you have any technical questions or other concerns about this site, feel free to contact us at webmaster@docguide.com.

All contents Copyright (c) 1995- Doctor's Guide Publishing Limited. All rights reserved.


Employment opportunities | Partnering opportunities