Gemcitabine Plus Axitinib Increases Survival Compared With Gemcitabine Alone in Patients With Advanced Pancreatic Cancer
Unregistered User
If this is not your name, click here.
Contact Us | Order Now | Journals | Bookstore | Register a colleague
 
  SEARCH  
News
Bookstore
Medline
The Web
Meetings & Congresses
Complete Doctor's Guide
 


 EXPLORE :
 news  All News
 webcasts All Webcasts
 All cases All Cases
 Meetings All Meetings & Congresses
 Medical All Medical Resources

top





New drugs / indications

English Dictionary

Medical Dictionary

Thesaurus



Warning | Privacy | Awards



 Favourite Journals 

Click here to choose your favourite journals


 Favourite Sites 

Click here to choose your favourite sites


 Languages 



  




Gemcitabine Plus Axitinib Increases Survival Compared With Gemcitabine Alone in Patients With Advanced Pancreatic Cancer

LONDON -- May 30, 2008 -- A study, recently published in The Lancet, finds that gemcitabine plus axitinib increases overall survival compared with gemcitabine alone in the treatment of pancreatic cancer.

Researchers aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of gemcitabine plus axitinib versus gemcitabine alone. Between January and August 2006, 103 patients with unresectable, locally advanced, or metastatic pancreatic cancer were randomly assigned in a 2 to 1 ratio to receive gemcitabine plus axitinib or gemcitabine alone. The primary endpoint was overall survival.

Results showed an increased median overall survival of 6.9 months with gemcitabine plus axitinib compared with 5.6 months for gemcitabine alone. Interestingly, the greatest bene€ts on survival were seen in patients with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0 to1 and in patients with locally advanced disease at baseline. Gemcitabine plus axitinib showed a similar safety pro€le to gemcitabine alone.

These results highlight the importance of good performance status in gemcitabine-based combination treatment of advanced pancreatic cancer. However, in view of the small number of patients in the present study with an ECOG performance status of 2, these data cannot be overinterpreted and should be treated as preliminary, rather than con€rmatory. The small, nonstatistically signi€cant gain in overall survival needs to be assessed in a randomised phase 3 trial.

SOURCE: The Lancet

E-mail this page
to a friend or colleague!
To print,
use this version




Any question regarding a medical diagnosis, treatment, referral, drug availability or pricing should be directed to either a licensed physician or to the product's manufacturer.

If you have any technical questions or other concerns about this site, feel free to contact us at webmaster@docguide.com.

All contents Copyright (c) 1995- Doctor's Guide Publishing Limited. All rights reserved.


Employment opportunities | Partnering opportunities