Patients With Intracerebral Haemorrhage Less Likely to Die in Hospital With Nicardipine Compared With Nitroprusside Infusion: Presented at AAN
Unregistered User
If this is not your name, click here.
Contact Us | Order Now | Journals | Bookstore | Register a colleague
 
  SEARCH  
News
Bookstore
Medline
The Web
Meetings & Congresses
Complete Doctor's Guide
 


 EXPLORE :
 news  All News
 webcasts All Webcasts
 All cases All Cases
 Meetings All Meetings & Congresses
 Medical All Medical Resources

top





New drugs / indications

English Dictionary

Medical Dictionary

Thesaurus



Warning | Privacy | Awards



 Favourite Journals 

Click here to choose your favourite journals


 Favourite Sites 

Click here to choose your favourite sites


 Languages 



  




Patients With Intracerebral Haemorrhage Less Likely to Die in Hospital With Nicardipine Compared With Nitroprusside Infusion: Presented at AAN

By Jill Stein

CHICAGO -- April 17, 2008 -- Patients with intracerebral haemorrhage who receive a continuous infusion of nicardipine to treat a blood-pressure surge have a lower in-hospital mortality rate than nitroprusside-treated patients during the first 24 hours without any increase in the length of stay, according to data presented here at the American Academy of Neurology (AAN) 60th Annual Meeting.

M. Fareed K. Suri, MD, Vascular and Interventional Neurologist, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, and colleagues, compared patients treated using either intravenous nicardipine or nitroprusside infusion during their hospitalisation for intracerebral haemorrhages over a recent 12-month period.

"A variety of intravenous medications are commonly used for immediate blood-pressure control, as there is no proven benefit of one medication over another in intracerebral haemorrhage," Dr. Suri noted in a presentation here on April 15. "No clinical data exist to compare outcomes between patients with intracerebral haemorrhage treated with different intravenous antihypertensive agents."

The data used in this analysis were drawn from the Premier database (a national hospital discharge database representing all in-hospital admissions in the United States), and include the 3M Health Information Systems All Patient Refined Diagnosis Related Group (3M APR-DRG) mortality-risk algorithm. The 4-point ordinal variables for "risk for mortality" are based on a patient's age and primary and secondary diagnoses, and are adjusted for the in-hospital procedures.

Of 12,767 patients admitted, 926 (7.3%) received nicardipine, 530 (4.3%) received sodium nitroprusside, and 53 (0.4%) patients received both medications within the first 24 hours of admission.

There was no significant difference in age, gender, and baseline risk of mortality among patients who were administered nicardipine or sodium nitroprusside.

Overall, 43% of patients treated with sodium nitroprusside died in hospital compared with 33% of nicardipine-treated patients (P < .01).

After controlling for age and disease severity, the risk of in-hospital mortality was higher among patients treated with sodium nitroprusside alone compared with nicardipine alone (odds ratio [OR] 1.7; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.3-2.1).

There was no difference in length of stay and total hospital cost after multivariate adjustment.

[Presentation title: A Multicenter Comparison of Outcomes With Nicardipine and Nitroprusside for Treatment of Acute Hypertension in Patients With Intracerebral Hemorrhage: The AMUST Study. Abstract P03.105]

E-mail this page
to a friend or colleague!
To print,
use this version




Any question regarding a medical diagnosis, treatment, referral, drug availability or pricing should be directed to either a licensed physician or to the product's manufacturer.

If you have any technical questions or other concerns about this site, feel free to contact us at webmaster@docguide.com.

All contents Copyright (c) 1995- Doctor's Guide Publishing Limited. All rights reserved.


Employment opportunities | Partnering opportunities