AAP: Ipratropium Beats Albuterol and Saline for Treatment of Bronchiolitis in Children
Unregistered User
If this is not your name, click here.
Contact Us | Order Now | Journals | Bookstore | Register a colleague
 
  SEARCH  
News
Bookstore
Medline
The Web
Meetings & Congresses
Complete Doctor's Guide
 


 EXPLORE :
 news  All News
 webcasts All Webcasts
 All cases All Cases
 Meetings All Meetings & Congresses
 Medical All Medical Resources

top





New drugs / indications

English Dictionary

Medical Dictionary

Thesaurus



Warning | Privacy | Awards



 Favourite Journals 

Click here to choose your favourite journals


 Favourite Sites 

Click here to choose your favourite sites


 Languages 



  




AAP: Ipratropium Beats Albuterol and Saline for Treatment of Bronchiolitis in Children

By Alison Palkhivala
Special to DG News

SAN FRANCISCO, CA -- October 25, 2001 -- A head-to-head comparison reveals that ipratropium bromide is more effective than either albuterol sulfate or saline for the treatment of bronchiolitis in infants in an emergency care setting.

When infants arrive at the emergency ward with symptoms of wheezing, a number of treatments are available for use but, their relative efficacies and safeties have not been compared directly. Srinivasian Suresh, MD, from the department of pediatrics at the Children's Hospital of Michigan, Detroit, Michigan, United States, presented his latest findings here this week at the National Conference and Exhibition of the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) on ipratropium vs. albuterol vs. saline for this indication.

For this double-blind, prospective study, 72 infants (aged six weeks to 18 months) presenting to the Children’s Hospital of Michigan emergency department with a first episode of wheezing were randomized to receive 3 ml of nebulized ipratropium 0.25 mg (n=24), albuterol 2.5 mg (n=24), or saline (n=24), each of which were administered with 10 L of oxygen over 10 minutes.

Overall, ipratropium emerged as the significantly more effective therapy. In those given ipratropium, mean respiratory rate (RR) decreased by 9.33 breaths, compared to 3.42 in the albuterol group, and 1.33 in the saline group. Similarly mean respiratory assessment score (RAS) decreased in the ipratropium group by 1.75 points, compared to 0. 96 in the albuterol group, and 0.58 in the saline group. Differences in changes in RR and RAS were significant when comparing the ipratropium group to the albuterol and saline groups, but the differences between the albuterol and saline groups themselves did not reach statistical significance.

Heart rate increased by an average of 12 beats per minute in the albuterol group. Similar effects were not seen in those treated with ipratropium or saline. Dr. Suresh concludes, therefore, that ipratropium comes out the winner in this study.

E-mail this page
to a friend or colleague!
To print,
use this version




Any question regarding a medical diagnosis, treatment, referral, drug availability or pricing should be directed to either a licensed physician or to the product's manufacturer.

If you have any technical questions or other concerns about this site, feel free to contact us at webmaster@docguide.com.

All contents Copyright (c) 1995- Doctor's Guide Publishing Limited. All rights reserved.


Employment opportunities | Partnering opportunities