ICTS: Rapamune (Sirolimus) Can Replace Cyclosporine As Anti-Rejection Medication For Kidney Transplants
Unregistered User
If this is not your name, click here.
Contact Us | Order Now | Journals | Bookstore | Register a colleague
 
  SEARCH  
News
Bookstore
Medline
The Web
Meetings & Congresses
Complete Doctor's Guide
 


 EXPLORE :
 news  All News
 webcasts All Webcasts
 All cases All Cases
 Meetings All Meetings & Congresses
 Medical All Medical Resources

top





New drugs / indications

English Dictionary

Medical Dictionary

Thesaurus



Warning | Privacy | Awards



 Favourite Journals 

Click here to choose your favourite journals


 Favourite Sites 

Click here to choose your favourite sites


 Languages 



  




ICTS: Rapamune (Sirolimus) Can Replace Cyclosporine As Anti-Rejection Medication For Kidney Transplants

ROME, ITALY -- August 31, 2000 -- Kidney transplant patients can be effectively treated with the new anti-rejection medication Rapamune (sirolimus) as the long-term primary therapy, permitting the withdrawal of the conventional immunosuppressant cyclosporine, a drug associated with a number of serious adverse effects such as kidney damage, hypertension, hirsuitism and gum overgrowth.

An international clinical study, presented here at the XVIII International Congress of the Transplantation Society, was conducted at 57 transplant centers in Europe, Australia and Canada and included 525 kidney transplant patients.

"These findings confirm that Sirolimus is an effective alternative to cyclosporine for long-term immunosuppression. It has the major advantage of not causing kidney damage and it is free from a number of other unpleasant side effects associated with cyclosporine" said lead investigator Robert Johnson, M.D., Director of Transplantation at the Manchester Royal Infirmary, Manchester,
United Kingdom. "The array of adverse effects caused by calcineurin inhibitors point to the clear imperative for an alternative therapy to be fully integrated into the immunsuppressive regimen."

The kidney transplant study patients were randomly assigned to two treatment groups: one group was maintained on triple therapy of cyclosporine, corticosteroids and 2mg Rapamune; in the other group, patients had their cyclosporine dosing stopped after three months of treatment. The aim of the study was to determine whether cyclosporine, which is part of the standard immunosuppressive drug regimen, could be safely eliminated while maintaining patients on sirolimus and steroids.

No grafts were lost in the study and kidney function in the cyclosporine-free patients was significantly improved. Graft survival at one year in the sirolimus-alone group was 97.3 percent, compared with 95 percent in the controlled group. There was a small increase of 6 percent in episodes of acute rejection in the sirolimus-alone group, but this difference did not reach statistical significance. All of the episodes of rejection were categorized as mild.

Cyclosporine has long been the therapeutic mainstay for preventing organ rejection after transplantation. However, it can cause progressive damage to the patient's kidneys -- the very organs that patients and their doctors are trying to save through transplantation. Cyclosporine's role in causing kidney damage is attributed to reducing the blood supply to the kidney by causing vascular spasm. It achieves its immunosuppressive effects by inhibiting calcineurin, an important enzyme in the body’s normal immune response.

Calcineurin inhibitors such as cyclosporine and tacrolimus produce well-documented adverse events such as kidney damage (nephrotoxicity), tremor (neurotoxicity) and high blood pressure (hypertension). Rapamune has a unique mechanism of action that does not involve calcineurin inhibition and therefore the kidneys are not exposed to the vascular spasm and other chronic toxicities observed with traditional drug regimens.

The findings announced today confirm and complement an earlier study that evaluated cyclosporine withdrawal. The previous study, led by Thomas Gonwa, M.D., of Baylor University Medical Center in Dallas, Texas, USA, demonstrated that discontinuation of cyclosporine at an early treatment stage resulted in significantly improved kidney function and no increase in the rate of acute rejection. Dr. Gonwa’s findings were presented at the Transplant 2000 meeting in May in Chicago, and were updated during a symposium at the ICTS meeting in Rome led by Dr. Donald E. Hricik of Case Western Reserve School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.

This study in the United States and Europe included 247 patients who underwent kidney transplantation. Patients were randomly assigned to receive the standard full-dose of cyclosporine plus 2 mg/day of Rapamune (Group A patients) or a reduced-dose of cyclosporine plus Rapamune (Group B patients). All patients were administered corticosteroids. During the third month after transplantation, those patients in Group B who had not experienced an episode of acute rejection had their cyclosporine dosage tapered and then eliminated.

Dr. Gonwa's primary endpoint was to assess kidney function after six months. Measuring creatinine, a metabolic waste product normally filtered and excreted by the kidney into the urine, is a standard method of assessing kidney function. Higher levels of serum creatinine in the blood mean the kidney is not properly filtering the creatinine and this correlates with impaired kidney function. The findings demonstrated that creatinine was significantly lower in Rapamune-treated patients who started treatment with low dose cyclosporine and then underwent cyclosporine elimination (Group B), compared with patients who continued to receive full-dose cyclosporine (Group A).

E-mail this page
to a friend or colleague!
To print,
use this version




Any question regarding a medical diagnosis, treatment, referral, drug availability or pricing should be directed to either a licensed physician or to the product's manufacturer.

If you have any technical questions or other concerns about this site, feel free to contact us at webmaster@docguide.com.

All contents Copyright (c) 1995- Doctor's Guide Publishing Limited. All rights reserved.


Employment opportunities | Partnering opportunities